Friday, 15 November 2013

Royal Succession Race Picks up Speed. Saudi Crown Prince Salman’s Head Is on the Block

Debka 15-Nov-13
The moment of truth in the race for the successor of 90-year old Saudi King Abdullah is fast approaching.
The monarch is coming close to the end of his tether although in full command of his political faculties. These days he works part-time, although when it comes to high policy on international and domestic matters, he is still critically involved.
For instance, it was Abdullah who received US Secretary of State John Kerry, when he visited Riyadh on Nov. 5, for a vain attempt to ease tensions between Washington and Riyadh.
But he no longer travels overseas on state visits.
In domestic affairs, the king leaves routine administrative matters to others, allowing Crown Prince Salman to stand in for him in the chair of weekly cabinet meetings. But he continues to lay down the law on key affairs of state, such as princely appointments and promotions.
In 2011, Abdullah took a strong hand in preparing the kingdom to ward off the likely spillover of the Arab Spring in the form of spontaneous popular and minority protests.
The royal order of succession has been a vexing item on the national agenda for many years, usually left up in the air until the last moment unless some crisis forces the issue.
In October 2011, the incumbent crown prince Sultan died, soon followed by his successor Prince Nayef, who gave up the ghost a few months later in June 2012.

Prince Muqrin versus Prince Mitab

This unforeseen sequence of deaths left a gap that had to be hurriedly filled. Nayef’s full brother, Salman, was elevated to the posts of Crown Prince, Defense Minister and First Deputy Prime Minister.
Then in February 2013, his half-brother Prince Muqrin, special adviser to the king, was named Second Deputy Prime minister, which placed him second in the line of succession after Salman.
Since Salman took over as Crown Prince in June 2012, rumors have abounded that he suffers from Alzheimer’s. He came to this high post after 50 years as governor of Riyadh Province with no real experience in national government. Neither has he ever displayed any leadership qualities. For whatever reason, DEBKA Weekly’s Gulf sources report that a consensus is forming in the royal house that he is not a fit successor to the throne and needs to be replaced
The race is on for his replacement, an issue which deeply divides the royal house.
Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal and General Intelligence Director Prince Bandar bin Sultan have been lobbying on behalf of Prince Miteb, King Abdullah’ son and head of the National Guard. This is a military force 100,000 strong made up of members of tribes loyal to the Saudi throne. It is essentially pro-American in orientation, arms and training.
Miteb’s candidacy is opposed by a rival group of princes whose politics are conservative.
The compromise candidate emerging at this time is Prince Muqrin, who at 68 is the youngest son of the royal house’s founding father and would most likely be the last member of his generation to ascend the throne before the grandsons start crowding in.

Pandora’s Box of Ibn Saud’s grandchildren

But the conservative faction has put up its own candidate.
He is Ahmad bin Ibn Saud, who took over the influential ministry of interior after the death of his brother Nayef. He only lasted five months in the job before being pushed out by Nayef’s son, Muhammad.
The relative size of support in the royal family for Muqrin and Muhammad has not been determined.
If Muhammad is chosen as Crown Prince, Muqrin will most likely stay where he is as second in line to the throne. But his appointment as crown prince would guarantee a smooth transition after Abdullah goes. On the other hand, it would open up a whole new Pandora’s Box, crammed with the founding father’s grandchildren.
They have never been authoritatively counted, but are estimated to number at least 10,000 princes. No more than a few hundred can expect to attain decent public positions in the government, army, security forces and provincial administrations.
A culling process of this third generation was conducting in recent years to select an elite group qualified for promotion and the succession. Two candidates stood out: King Abdullah’s son, the National Guard commander Miteb, and Nayef’s son Muhammed, who as interior minister has at his command a powerful military-cum-police-cum- ntelligence service.
Both were born in the 50s, have good connections in Washington and keep their political views close to their vests – especially on controversial domestic affairs of high popular interest – so as not to compromise their future prospects.

Finally choosing candidates according to ability – not birth

It is not known why the conservative princes were against Mitab’s placement in the line of succession to the throne – possibly because it would introduce King Abdullah’s branch of the royal family into the contest for future monarchs at the expense of the descendants of branches which have traditionally shared out the perks and plums of monarchical rule among themselves.
The two powerful princes, Saud al-Faisal and Bandar bin Sultan are leading the drive to replace Salman as crown prince because they have excluded themselves from the succession race.
Foreign Minister Saud, aged 74 and the son of King Faisal, is thought to suffer from Parkinson’s Disease; whereas Intelligence Chief Bandar, although only 64, is out of the running because although his father, Sultan, was crown prince, his mother was a Sudanese slave.

It is important to note, say DEBKA Weekly’s Saudi experts, that the two veteran princes, by working together to replace Salman as crown prince with Muqrin, have broken new ground in Saudi royal politics. Born to different branches of the Saud family, their association for the first time transcends royal descent – Sudairis versus anti-Sudairis – and brings them together to select candidates for high office according to their ability and fitness for the job, rather than their father’s place in the royal pecking order.

HOT POINTS
A Digest of DEBKAfile Round-the-Clock Exclusives in Week Ending Nov. 14, 2013
November 8, 2013 Briefs
   Egypt holds parliamentary elections in the spring
Egypt will hold parliamentary elections in February or March, two months after the country votes in a referendum on a new constitution. Egyptian foreign minister Nabil Fahmy said the Freedom and Justice Party, political arm of the deposed president Mohamed Morsi's Muslim Brotherhood, "is still legal in Egypt" and free to participate in the parliamentary election, he said.
   Notorious Mullah Fazlullah elected head of Pakistani Taliban
   Islamabad fears the election of Mullah Fazlullah, notorious for his atrocities in the Swat province, as new Pakistani Taliban leader, foredooms the government’s push for peace dialogue with the Islamist movement.
   Fire bomb attack hurts Israeli mother and children
   In the fourth Palestinian attack in 24 hours, a woman and her children were slightly injured when their car was set ablaze by fire bombs near Efrat Friday morning. The mother extricated the children from the burning car. Thursday night, a Palestinian was shot dead when he tried to stab a Border Police Guardsman at the Bethlehem checkpoint. The officer was unhurt. Another Palestinian was killed when he opened fire on a group of soldiers awaiting a lift at the Tapuah Junction on the West Bank.
   Kerry: Breakdown of talks will lead to a third intifada
   This warning was broadcast by US Secretary of State John Kerry in a TV interview from Jerusalem Thursday night. He said the alternative to talks between Israel and the Palestinians would be chaos, violence, Israel’s increased isolation and attacks on its legitimacy. The US did not accept the legitimacy of building Jewish settlements on land destined for a Palestinian state, but he said Israel had not promised a settlement freeze for negotiations.

Iran Targeted for Terror. Saudis Fund Clandestine Groups Fighting Regime in Tehran

Debka 15-Nov-13
The Islamic Republic of Iran is getting a dose of its own medicine.
While Iran’s diplomats last week jousted with the Six Powers in Geneva over its nuclear program, Tehran was doubly bedeviled by an economy driven perilously close bankruptcy by sanctions and a plague of terrorism and assassinations at home.
DEBKA Weekly’s Gulf and Tehran sources report that minority and dissident underground groups have sprung into coordinated armed action in different parts of the country in recent weeks. They are organized and funded by Saudi intelligence, which also draws on input from Israel, and are targeting high-ranking Iranian officials and Revolutionary Guards commanders involved in nuclear projects.
Not all the attacks are brought to the knowledge of the public. The exception was the most recent case Sunday, Nov. 10, when Deputy Industries, Mines and Trade Minister for Parliamentary Affairs, Safdar Rahmatabadi, was shot dead in his car by one or two professional assassins.
The next day, the Tehran police claimed a suspect was in custody. A senior Iranian security official said his murder was not a terrorist or a politically-motivated act and the minister knew his assailant, a claim his brother flatly denied.

Saudis engineer minority unrest in four far-flung regions

But secrecy has been clamped down on a string of assassinations in recent weeks of middle-ranking Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) officers. The two cases which came out nonetheless were presented as suicides, although both officers were brutally murdered at night in wooded areas.
The most prominent victim was Mojtaba Ahmadi, a key IRGC cyber war expert, who was discovered in a forest outside Karaj, a town 40 kilometers from Tehran.

Along with these hits, Iran’s restive minorities appear to be building up for armed revolt, especially in Sistan-Baluchistan, where last month, gunmen killed 14 Iranian army conscripts in an ambush on the Pakistan border, then murdered Moussa Nouri Qal’e Nov, the General Prosecutor of Zabol.
Fifteen Baluchi activists were hanged in reprisal.
Violent incidents are also breaking out in oil-rich Khuzestan, the Kurdish regions and the Azerbaijan border district.
On the face of it, these incidents, occurring as they do in four far-flung corners of Iran, do not seem connected. However, DEBKA Weekly’s exclusive sources report they are all part of a detailed blueprint for coordinated covert action drawn up by the secret services of Saudi Arabia, the Gulf Emirates and Israel.
Those sources reveal that Riyadh has earmarked $500 million for operations to stir up dissent among Iran’s ethnic minorities in order to harass the Iranian government into discontinuing its drive for a nuclear weapon or even causing its overthrow.
The Saudis have never before ventured to engage Iran directly. Now, they are fired up by the sight of the Obama administration getting together with the Islamic regime to engineer six-power recognition of Iran’s nuclear aspirations.

Iran retaliates with mass executions

Iran’s rulers are convinced that Israel is responsible for the new mood in Riyadh and is egging the Saudis on with offers to place its considerable experience and intelligence know-how at their disposal.
But in fact, the live wire behind the new, proactive Saudi policy is its director of general intelligence, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, who decided it was time to bypass futile diplomacy and remove the gloves for direct action in Iran’s home court.
Tehran is reported by our Iranian sources to have decided to get its own back by responding in kind.
This happened when Tehran received intelligence that Baluchi guerrillas were being trained in a small village near the Pakistani Baluchi capital of Quetta by heavily bearded instructors clad in local garb. Suspecting those instructors were Saudi and Israeli agents in disguise, Tehran targeted that village for a commando raid to destroy the training camp and liquidate the disguised agents.
The latest round of Baluchi violence erupted after a year of inaction, following the execution of the Jundallah separatist leader Abdel-Malek Rigui.
The new group rising in its stead, called Jeysh-ol-Adl (Warriors of Justice), is held responsible for the ambush of Iranian troops and the murder of the Zabol prosecutor.

Guerilla training for Khuzestani and Kurdish activists

The Arab-speaking inhabitants of the southwestern province of Khuzestan, where Iran’s main oilfields are located, are in a constant state of ferment against Tehran. Of late, two underground groups are going about sabotaging oil and gas pipelines and petrochemical factories, while also assassinating government officials. They call themselves Mohayyeddin Al-Nasser and the Arabian Movement for the liberation of Al-Ahvaz. Both draw on assistance from Saudi Arabia and various Gulf clandestine services, especially the UAE.
Iran has homed in on Bahrain, where the Saudis are using their strong military presence to set up training camps for guerilla groups to conduct covert operations in Iran.
Upon completing their training, they are smuggled into Basra, southern Iraq to infiltrate Iran across the Shat Al Arb River.
Most are young Arabs from Khuzestan, dedicated to fighting for independence from Iranian rule.
Tehran has struck back with a campaign of cruel repression and put scores of young men to death on charges of terrorism.
Another large slice of Saudi funding is spent on training Kurdish guerrillas at facilities set up for the purpose in the Autonomous Kurdish Republic of northern Iraq outside Irbil. Some of the instructors there work for Israeli security firms employed in the republic.
In the Kurdish region of Iran, clashes have followed attacks by armed groups on Revolutionary Guards and security forces.

To teach the locals a lesson, a number of Kurdish activists were put to death. But this punishment had the reverse effect of stirring the populace into angry retribution.

Tehran ripe for popular dissent

There is yet another trouble spot on Iran’s northwestern border with Azerbaijan, where armed minority groups have taken to attacking regime targets. The last incident was a guerrilla attack from Azerbaijan on a minibus carrying schoolchildren near the border town of Jolfa.
Iran’s intelligence agencies believe that subversive action is being directed against Iran from Azerbaijan, where they say Israel has set up surveillance and eavesdropping bases as well as facilities for training guerilla forces for operations against the Iranian regime.
The attack on the minibus they believe may have been a training exercise.
Confidential reports on this upsurge of violence prepared by the IRGC’s intelligence unit and the National Security Council call for covert operations to deal with the troubles expeditiously. They fear Israel and Saudi Arabia are conspiring to force the IRGC to scatter its units across the country and dilute the protective ring around the central regime or order to make it easy prey for a popular uprising.
Circumstances in Tehran are ripe for trouble: Inflation is roaring, foreign currency reserves have sunk from $80 to 20 billion and the national coffers are bare. The capital’s population of 12 million has always been the core and touchstone of national anti-government dissent.

Split in Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda-Iraq Presses Forward for First Jihadist State Spanning Mid East Borders

Last minute breaking news: The top level of the Obama administration is reported by DEBKA Weekly’s Washington sources Thursday night to be deeply divided over policies on Iran, Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
The National Security Adviser Susan Rice and members of the NSC in the White House are strongly opposed to the line taken by Secretary of State John Kerry and the State Department on these pivotal foreign policy issues.


A throwaway remark by White House spokesman Jay Carney Tuesday, Nov. 12, gave the game away: “The American people do not want a march to war,” he told reporters.
It was not immediately realized that this was one way of saying that his boss, President Barack Obama, had given up on the military option against Iran by handing the prerogative to the American people.
Carney went on to warn that “spoiling the diplomatic talks with Iran would be a march to war.”
Finally, he said, “The only way to see if Iran is actually serious about giving up its ambition for nuclear weapons is to loosen sanctions and see if the Iranians reciprocate.”
Those remarks betrayed how the Obama administration had stepped back from one bargaining position after another in its anxiety for a negotiated deal with Iran: America no longer held a military operation over Iran’s head if diplomacy failed to curb its nuclear program; and was willing to ease sanctions without waiting for Tehran to reciprocate by articulating concessions.
According to DEBKA Weekly, Washington decided to throw away its highest cards in desperation, after failing to bulldoze all six powers attending the Geneva negotiations with Iran into endorsing the three-page nuclear accord and, still more devastatingly, get it approved in Tehran.
Obama now finds his diplomatic track for resolving the nuclear issue in limbo.


The insurmountable barrier of Khamenei’s silence


Every attempt by Washington to elicit an Iranian response through its secret channels to Tehran fell on deaf ears. The US message urging action to avert a long impasse reached President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Javad Zarif. But Washington was preaching to the converted.
They did not need to be told that without unbroken progress toward a settlement, nuclear diplomacy was doomed and they would share the blame for its failure with the US administration.
But the two Iranian officials faced the same insurmountable obstacle as Obama: Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s silence.

This impasse exposed once again the fatal flaw in the Iranian policy pursued by President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, which relied on a seemingly moderate new Iranian president and foreign minister to crack Iran’s intransigent front, when Ayatollah Khamenei continued to stand in their path.
The back-channel for communication between the White House in Washington and the supreme leader’s office opened briefly four months ago to receive messages from Obama delivered by Oman’s Sultan Qaboos.
It has since shut down at Khamenei’s end: the president’s messages continued to be delivered, but they are not answered.
Two more attempts were made to breach the wall of silence raised by Iran’s supreme leader.
The UN undersecretary general for political affairs, former US ambassador Jeffrey Feltman, made two trips to Iran in 15 months, the highest ranking US official to visit Iran since 1979. In his last visit on August 26, Feltman was in Tehran for a meeting between Khamenei and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. But aside from a few polite words, no conversation passed between him and the Iranian leader.

No change in Iran’s nuclear program under Rouhani

The nuclear watchdog Yukiya Amano’s visit to Tehran Monday, Nov. 11, was not as officially presented a journey to sign a cooperation accord with Iran; it was the Obama administration’s second attempt to penetrate the wall surrounding Khamenei and get his go-ahead for keeping the negotiating ball rolling on the nuclear issue.
Behind the scenes, Foreign Minister Javad Zarif had promised Washington he would arrange an interview.
But Amano left Tehran not only empty-handed but humiliated by the cold shoulder shown him by the ayatollah.
The mild-spoken Amano later vented his resentment at the affront with a comment which struck at the heart of Obama’s policy for Iran:
"I can say… no radical change is reported to me," - since Hassan Rouhani took over as president three months ago, the IAEA chief said in an interview in Vienna the day after he returned from Tehran.
He went on to comment that Iran is continuing to enrich uranium to 20 percent, contradicting reports emanating from Washington that Tehran had suspended enrichment at this level.
Amano was furious at being roped into signing a worthless piece of paper to enable Tehran to demonstrate non-existent “progress” towards an accord with the six powers on its nuclear program, when the negotiations were in fact being kept on idle by its own supreme leader.

US and Iran Both Tread Water. Washington Drops Military Option, Yet Khamenei Still Won’t Play Ball

Last minute breaking news: The top level of the Obama administration is reported by DEBKA Weekly’s Washington sources Thursday night to be deeply divided over policies on Iran, Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
The National Security Adviser Susan Rice and members of the NSC in the White House are strongly opposed to the line taken by Secretary of State John Kerry and the State Department on these pivotal foreign policy issues.


A throwaway remark by White House spokesman Jay Carney Tuesday, Nov. 12, gave the game away: “The American people do not want a march to war,” he told reporters.
It was not immediately realized that this was one way of saying that his boss, President Barack Obama, had given up on the military option against Iran by handing the prerogative to the American people.
Carney went on to warn that “spoiling the diplomatic talks with Iran would be a march to war.”
Finally, he said, “The only way to see if Iran is actually serious about giving up its ambition for nuclear weapons is to loosen sanctions and see if the Iranians reciprocate.”
Those remarks betrayed how the Obama administration had stepped back from one bargaining position after another in its anxiety for a negotiated deal with Iran: America no longer held a military operation over Iran’s head if diplomacy failed to curb its nuclear program; and was willing to ease sanctions without waiting for Tehran to reciprocate by articulating concessions.
According to DEBKA Weekly, Washington decided to throw away its highest cards in desperation, after failing to bulldoze all six powers attending the Geneva negotiations with Iran into endorsing the three-page nuclear accord and, still more devastatingly, get it approved in Tehran.
Obama now finds his diplomatic track for resolving the nuclear issue in limbo.


The insurmountable barrier of Khamenei’s silence


Every attempt by Washington to elicit an Iranian response through its secret channels to Tehran fell on deaf ears. The US message urging action to avert a long impasse reached President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Javad Zarif. But Washington was preaching to the converted.
They did not need to be told that without unbroken progress toward a settlement, nuclear diplomacy was doomed and they would share the blame for its failure with the US administration.
But the two Iranian officials faced the same insurmountable obstacle as Obama: Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s silence.

This impasse exposed once again the fatal flaw in the Iranian policy pursued by President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, which relied on a seemingly moderate new Iranian president and foreign minister to crack Iran’s intransigent front, when Ayatollah Khamenei continued to stand in their path.
The back-channel for communication between the White House in Washington and the supreme leader’s office opened briefly four months ago to receive messages from Obama delivered by Oman’s Sultan Qaboos.
It has since shut down at Khamenei’s end: the president’s messages continued to be delivered, but they are not answered.
Two more attempts were made to breach the wall of silence raised by Iran’s supreme leader.
The UN undersecretary general for political affairs, former US ambassador Jeffrey Feltman, made two trips to Iran in 15 months, the highest ranking US official to visit Iran since 1979. In his last visit on August 26, Feltman was in Tehran for a meeting between Khamenei and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. But aside from a few polite words, no conversation passed between him and the Iranian leader.

No change in Iran’s nuclear program under Rouhani

The nuclear watchdog Yukiya Amano’s visit to Tehran Monday, Nov. 11, was not as officially presented a journey to sign a cooperation accord with Iran; it was the Obama administration’s second attempt to penetrate the wall surrounding Khamenei and get his go-ahead for keeping the negotiating ball rolling on the nuclear issue.
Behind the scenes, Foreign Minister Javad Zarif had promised Washington he would arrange an interview.
But Amano left Tehran not only empty-handed but humiliated by the cold shoulder shown him by the ayatollah.
The mild-spoken Amano later vented his resentment at the affront with a comment which struck at the heart of Obama’s policy for Iran:
"I can say… no radical change is reported to me," - since Hassan Rouhani took over as president three months ago, the IAEA chief said in an interview in Vienna the day after he returned from Tehran.
He went on to comment that Iran is continuing to enrich uranium to 20 percent, contradicting reports emanating from Washington that Tehran had suspended enrichment at this level.
Amano was furious at being roped into signing a worthless piece of paper to enable Tehran to demonstrate non-existent “progress” towards an accord with the six powers on its nuclear program, when the negotiations were in fact being kept on idle by its own supreme leader.